User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.4; Linux) KHTML/4.4.3 (like Gecko) Fedora/4.4.3-2.fc11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.4KHTML 4.4.3Fedora 11desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.4KHTML Linux Desktop0.023 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.4closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.4KHTML Fedora 4.4desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.4;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.4closeFedora 4.4.3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.4.3closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.4 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.4KHTML 4.4.3Fedora 11desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.4closeFedora 11closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:11 | by ThaDafinser