User agent detail

ERO247 Android Application (16, ero247 v2.2.2) - LGE LG-E510 lge - FFFFFFFF-C802-6EB7-A216-AB795187A96A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGE510closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ERO247 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS Applicationcloseclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Android Browser closeAndroid LGOptimus Hubmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Android Browser WebKit Android LGLGsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid LGE510closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android LGLGE510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
ERO247 Android 2.2.2LGOptimus Hubmobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android close Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid LGLGcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:58:10 | by ThaDafinser