User agent detail

LGE-MX9700_VEZ/1.0 Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; ) 240X400
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGMX9700closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 6.0close LGMX9700 VEZdesktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident LGMX9700smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0close LGMX9700closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 6.0 LGMX9700 VEZmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGMX9700Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 6.0close LGMX9700closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:59 | by ThaDafinser