User agent detail

iCab/2.9 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-icab.yaml
iCab 2.9 Mac OS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
iCab 2.9WebKit MacPPC AppleMacintoshDesktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iCab 2.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

iCab 2.9closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iCab 2.9iCab Mac desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
iCab 2.9close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iCab 2.9close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

iCab 2.9 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

iCab 2.9close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

iCab 2.9 Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iCab 2.9 Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
iCab 2.9closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:59 | by ThaDafinser