User agent detail

WIRE/0.11 (Linux; i686; Robot,Spider,Crawler,aromano@cli.di.unipi.it)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WIRE 0.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
WIRE 0.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesWIRE/0.11 bclose0.22701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWIREclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Linux closeclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:59 | by ThaDafinser