User agent detail

Mozilla/5.001 (Macintosh; N; PPC; ja) Gecko/25250101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeMacOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.001close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.001 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.1Gecko 25250101Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:54 | by ThaDafinser