User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; de-DE; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Netscape 7.02closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 7.0Gecko Win95 95Desktop0.028 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape 7.02closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 7.02closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 7.02Gecko Windows 95desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 7.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.2closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 7.02Gecko 1.0.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 7.02closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 7.2Gecko 20030208Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 7.02Gecko 1.0.2Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 7.02closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:49 | by ThaDafinser