User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; N; WinNT; en-US; m14) Netscape6/6.0b1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 6.0b1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 6.0 Windows NTdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 6.0b1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.0.0closeWindows NT closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 6 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 6.0b1 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 6.0 Windows desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 6closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:44 | by ThaDafinser