User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (;;;) AppleWebKit/538.8 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; inverto; IDL-6651N Volksbox Web Edition; 1.0; 1.0;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 538.8 IDL 6651N Volksbox Web Editiontelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 538.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
InvertoIDL-6651N Volksbox Web Editiontv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close invertoIDL-6651N Volksbox Web Editioncloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 538.8 InvertoIDL 6651N Volksbox Web Editiontelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:42 | by ThaDafinser