User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Teleca Q7; Brew 3.1.5; U; en) 480X800 LGE VX11000
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Teleca Q7close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo Brew 3.1Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeBrew closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 7closeBrew 3.1.5LGEnv Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Brew 3.1LGVX11000smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGVX11000closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo Q7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7 Brew 3.1.5LGEnv Touchmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux LGVX 11000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7close LGVX11000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:40 | by ThaDafinser