User agent detail

Opera/9.80 WebKit/1.6.3 () PhilipsWebKit/535.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PhilipsWebKitclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.80close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.80Presto PhilipsWebKitsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.80close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.80close PhilipsWebKitcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.80WebKit 1.6.3closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.80close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.80WebKit 1.6.3 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.80Webkit 1.6.3 desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.027 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.80close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:40 | by ThaDafinser