User agent detail

DocZilla/1.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
DocZilla 1.0closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DocZilla 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows NTdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Gecko 1.0.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
DocZilla 1.0closeWindows NT 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:39 | by ThaDafinser