User agent detail

Opera/9.25 (X11; Linux i686; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.25 Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.25Presto 2.0Linux Desktop0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.25closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.25closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.25Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.25closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.25closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.25 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.25closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.25 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.25 Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.25closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.25closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.25closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:37 | by ThaDafinser