User agent detail

UCWEB8.4.0.150/28/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
UC Browser 8.4.0.150 closeclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
UCWEB8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.4 0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.4.0.150 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.4Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.4.0.150close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:29 | by ThaDafinser