User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LGE-UN200/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.2 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 MMP/2.0 Novarra-Vision/8.0) Gecko/20100401 1web Novarra-Vision/8.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGUN200closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Novarra Vision 8.0close LGUN200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGUN200smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGUN200closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.83805 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Vision Mobile Browser 8.0Gecko 20100401 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Novarra Vision 8.0Gecko LGUN200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Novarra Vision 8.0close LGUN200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:29 | by ThaDafinser