User agent detail

MQQBrowser/2.2(KQB22_GA;Nokia2700c/09.97)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Nokia2700cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Nokia close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MQQBrowser 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QQbrowser 2.2close Nokia2700 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QQ Browser 2.2 Symbian Nokia2700csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Nokia Browser 09.97)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 2.2close Nokia2700ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose1.15207 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QQ Browser 2.2 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 2700ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QQ Browser 2.2 Series40 Nokia2700 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MQQBrowser 2.2close Nokia2700closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:25 | by ThaDafinser