User agent detail

MOT-ta02/06.04.2fr_columbia_3mnc_fix MIB/1.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Motorolata02closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser 1.2 MotorolaTA02Mobile Phoneyes0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-ta02 06.04.2frcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 1.2.1close MotorolaC330/C333/C336mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Motorolata02smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolata02closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 1.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 1.2.1 Motorolata02mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close MotorolaC330/C333/C336Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 1.2.1close Motorolata02closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:21 | by ThaDafinser