User agent detail

HTC_Mega Opera / 9.5 (Microsoft Windows ; PPC Opera Mobi /17753 ; U; es-ES)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCMegaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera Mobicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera MobicloseWindows closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCMegamobile-browseryescloseclose0.22201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows HTCMega Operasmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCMegacloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.5 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile Windows Mobile HTCTouch 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera Mobile close HTCMegaFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCMegacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:16 | by ThaDafinser