User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-A157/A157UCLD1 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/4.2 SMM-MMS/1.2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSGH-A157closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 4.2NetFront JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 4.2closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SGH-A157 A157UCLD1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 4.2close SamsungSGH-A157mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 4.2NetFront SamsungSGH-A157smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.2close SamsungSGH-A157closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 4.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 4.2 SamsungSGH-A157mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 4.2close SamsungSGH-A157Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 4.2close SamsungSGH-A157closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:16 | by ThaDafinser