User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Iceape/2.0.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Iceape 2.0Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Iceape 2.0Gecko Linux Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Iceape 2.0closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.1.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IceApe 2.0.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Iceape 2.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceape 2.0.11closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.1.16closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Iceape 2.0.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Iceape 2.0.11Gecko 20101227Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Iceape 2.0.11Gecko 1.9.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Iceape 2.0.11closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:15 | by ThaDafinser