User agent detail

Amiga-AWeb/3.4.167SE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Amiga AWeb 3.4.167SEclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Amiga-AWeb 3.4.167SEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Amiga Aweb 3.4.167SEcloseAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Amiga Aweb 3.4 AmigaOS desktop0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
AWeb 3.4.167 closeclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Amiga AWeb 3.4.167SEclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:14 | by ThaDafinser