User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Powermarks/3.5; Windows 95/98/2000/NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
yesPowermarksBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesPowermarksBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesPowermarksclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows 95desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:13 | by ThaDafinser