User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 007ac9 Crawler; http://crawler.007ac9.net/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-350.php
yes007AC9 CrawlerBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yes007AC9 CrawlerBot/Crawler0.021 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyes007AC9 Crawlerclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:09 | by ThaDafinser