User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; AOL 4.0; Mac_68K)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
IE 4.01Tasman unknownMac68K unknownAppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 4.01Tasman Mac68K AppleMacintoshDesktop0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 4.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

AOL Explorer 4.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 4.01Trident 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 4.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.1close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

AOL 4.0closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 4.1Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 4.0.1Tasman Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
AOL 4.0closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:57:00 | by ThaDafinser