User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-B7300C_CMCC/1.0 Opera 9.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-B7300Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 9.5close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mobile 9.5close SamsungGT-B7300Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.5Presto SamsungGT-B7300Csmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.5close SamsungGT-B7300Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.5 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile 9.5 SamsungGT-B7300Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.06 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.5close SamsungGT-B7300Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:58 | by ThaDafinser