User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040406 Galeon/1.3.15
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Galeon 1.3Gecko unknownFreeBSD unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Galeon 1.3Gecko FreeBSD Desktop0.049 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Galeon 1.3closeFreeBSD closecloseDesktopclose0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Galeon 1.3.15closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.21801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Galeon 1.3Gecko FreeBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Galeon 1.3.15closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Galeon 1.3.15closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.6closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Galeon 1.3.15closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Galeon 1.3.15Gecko 20040406FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Galeon 1.3.15Gecko 1.6FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Galeon 1.3.15closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:58 | by ThaDafinser