User agent detail

Opera/6.04 (Windows 2000; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Opera 6.04Presto unknownWin2000 5.0unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 6.04Presto Win2000 5.0Desktop0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.04closeWindows 2000desktop-browsercloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.04Presto Windows 2000desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.04close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.4closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.04 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.04close closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.4 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.04 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.04closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 6.04closeWindows 2000 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.04closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:58 | by ThaDafinser