User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; samsung-gt-s5260) UCBrowser8.2.0.132/69/452/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunggt-s5260closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.054 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungStar IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.26002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.2 Samsunggt-s5260smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0close Samsunggt-s5260closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.2.0.132 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Touchwiz SamsungStar IImobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.2.0.132close Samsunggt-s5260closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:53 | by ThaDafinser