User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.4 (SAMSUNG GT-C6112)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
QQ Browser Mini 2.4 GT-C6112mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
QQbrowser Mini 2.4WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
QQbrowser Mini 2.4closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MQQBrowser Mini2.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QQbrowser Mini2.4close SamsungGT-C6112mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QQ Browser 2.4 SamsungGT-C6112smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.4close SamsungGT-C6112closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QQ Browser Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QQ Browser Mini 2.4 SamsungGT-C6112mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MQQBrowser Mini2.4close SamsungC6112closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:53 | by ThaDafinser