User agent detail

PANTECH-EUROPA-U4000-orange/1.0 Obigo/Q04C MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechEUROPA-U4000-orangeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH-EUROPA-U4000-orange 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM PantechEUROPA U4000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q04C PantechEUROPAsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 4close PantechEUROPA-U4000-orangecloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 04 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q04C Browser Q04C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 4C PantechEUROPA-U4000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q04Cclose PantechEUROPA U4000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q04Cclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:48 | by ThaDafinser