User agent detail

OPPOA617/2.07/11 Release/2011.6.14 Browser/Opera Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Opera Mobile mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera Profilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera ProfilecloseJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mobile close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
OPPOA617smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera MIDP-2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 2.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24902 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera Profileclose OPPOcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:43 | by ThaDafinser