User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; xx; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030616
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-os2.yaml
Gecko 1.3OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.3closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
OS/2 desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.3closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.3Gecko 20030616OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.3OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:43 | by ThaDafinser