User agent detail

MOT-C168i/1.0 Release/13.07.2007 Browser/CMCS1.0 Software/2.350
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaC168iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-mib.yaml
Motorola Internet Browser 1.0 C168imobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaC168iMobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-C168i 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close MotorolaC168imobile-browseryescloseclose0.22201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
MotorolaC168ismartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaC168icloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 1.0 MotorolaC168imobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close MotorolaC168iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close MotorolaC168icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:42 | by ThaDafinser