User agent detail

Mozilla/2.02 (OS/2; I)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-os2.yaml
Netscape Navigator 2.0.2 OS/2 desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 2.0Gecko OS/2 Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 2.0closeOS/2 closecloseDesktopclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 2.0.2closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
OS/2 desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 2.2 OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Navigator 2.0.2 OS/2 desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:40 | by ThaDafinser