User agent detail

Microsoft Office Word 2014
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
Word 2014Trident unknownunknown unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Word 2014Trident Desktop0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Word 2014close closecloseDesktopclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Microsoft closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeChromeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Microsoft Word 2014 closeclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Microsoft Office close Microsoftcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:37 | by ThaDafinser