User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp China; http://misc.yahoo.com.cn/help.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Yahoo! Slurp close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesYahoo! Slurp ChinaBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesYahoo! Slurp Chinaclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesYahoo! Slurp Chinaclose0.22901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesYahoo! SlurpSearch bot0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesInktomi Slurpclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurp ChinaCrawler0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Yahoo! Slurp Web Crawler Bot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.26602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:36 | by ThaDafinser