User agent detail

FAST Enterprise Crawler/5.3.4 (crawler@fast.no)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesFAST Enterprise Crawlerclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesFAST Enterprise CrawlerBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesFAST Enterprise Crawlerclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
FAST closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesFAST Enterprise Crawlerclose0.24001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFAST Enterprise Crawlerclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesFAST Enterprise CrawlerCrawler0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesFAST Enterprise Crawlerclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:34 | by ThaDafinser