User agent detail

AMT Games/SAS3/2.043/__STABLE__ (LG-E460;androidOS;4.1.2;Europe/Berlin;de_DE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGE460closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AMT closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close LGE460;androidOS;4.1.2;Europemobile-browseryescloseclose0.23201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Android Browser WebKit Android LGE460smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGE460closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android LGLGE460closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Android Browser Android LGOptimus L5 IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid LGE460closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:33 | by ThaDafinser