User agent detail

Samsung-SCHU440 Infraware-Polaris/6.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSCHU440closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Samsung-SCHU440 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 6.0closeJVM SamsungSCH U440mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungSCHU440smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHU440closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Polaris 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.081 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSCHU440 Infraware-Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungSCH U440Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHU440closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:30 | by ThaDafinser