User agent detail

YahooCacheSystem
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesYahooCacheSystemBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesYahooCacheSystemclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
YahooCacheSystem closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Yahoo cache system closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesYahoo! Cache Systemclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:28 | by ThaDafinser