User agent detail

Opera/6.04 (Windows NT 4.0; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Opera 6.04closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 6.04Presto WinNT 4.0Desktop0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.04closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.04Presto Windows NTdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.04closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.4closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.04 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.04closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.4 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42703 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.04 Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.04closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 6.04closeWindows NT 4.0Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.04closeWindows NT 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:28 | by ThaDafinser