User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.0.17) Gecko WebThumb/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WebThumb 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.0.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9.0.17closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebThumb 1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.0.17closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.9.0.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.9.0.17Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.9.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:26 | by ThaDafinser