User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) akregator/4.11.5 Safari/537.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/feed_reader.yml
Akregator 4.11.5 GNU/Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Safari WebKit Linux Desktop0.09501 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 537.21closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 537.21closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 537.21closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.27702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Akregator 4.11 GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 537.21WebKit 537.21closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 537.21Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 537.21Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:24 | by ThaDafinser