User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.2; Linux) KHTML/4.2.4 (like Gecko) Slackware/13.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Konqueror 4.2closeSlackware closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.2KHTML Linux Desktop0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.2closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.2KHTML Slackware 13.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.2;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.2closeSlackware 13.0closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.2.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.2 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.27602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.2KHTML 4.2.4Slackware 13.0desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.2closeSlackware closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:22 | by ThaDafinser