User agent detail

ia_archiver/8.7 (Windows NT 5.0; )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ia_archiver 8.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesInternet ArchiveBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesInternet Archiveclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ia closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesia_archiverclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesAlexaclose0.41902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesAlexa CrawlerSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesia_archiverclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesia_archiverCrawler0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesAlexaclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:21 | by ThaDafinser