User agent detail

websitepulse checker/1.1 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Netscape 4.75; Linux)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesWebSitePulseSite Monitor0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeswebsitepulse checkerBot/Crawler0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeswebsitepulse checkerclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesWebSitePulseSite Monitor0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.5closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.5 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose1.15407 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 5.5 Linux closeclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 4.75closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:19 | by ThaDafinser