User agent detail

J-PHONE/5.0/V801SH/SN000000000 SH/0005aa Profile /MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 Ext-Profile/JSCL-1.1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
V801SHmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
J-PHONE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SharpV801SHmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SoftbankV801SHsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SharpV801SHmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile V801SHcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SoftbankJ-DN02Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:17 | by ThaDafinser