User agent detail

PANTECH-C320/R01 Browser/Obigo/Q03C Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechC320closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.021 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH-C320 R01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM PantechC320mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03C PantechC320smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close PantechC320closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C PantechC320mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q03Cclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:09 | by ThaDafinser