User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; HTC_Touch_Diamond2_T5353; Windows Phone 6.5.3.5)
Additional headers
UA-OS Windows CE (Pocket PC) - Version 5.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5Touch Diamond 2mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 6.0Trident WinXP 5.1Desktop0.032 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0closeWinXP closecloseDesktopclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 6.0closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 6.0closeWindows 5.1HTCTouch Diamond 2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Phone 6.5HTCTouch Diamond2 T5353smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows Phone 6.5HTCTouch_Diamond2_T5353closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.13601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.18402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44705 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
IE 6.0closeWindows XPFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows Phone 6.5.3.5HTCTouchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-17 06:37:38 | by ThaDafinser