User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/14.0; Linux) KHTML/TDEHTML/14.0.1 (like Gecko) (Debian)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 14.0KHTML Debian desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeDebian closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 14.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 14.0KHTML Debian desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 14.0;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 14.0closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 14.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 14.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 14.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 14.0KHTML Debian desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 14.0closeDebian GNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:56:03 | by ThaDafinser